The new paradigm: The contribution of each to all creates an obligation of the part of all to help each. Each contributes to all with the sole motive of creating that obligation. And all helps each only because of the contribution of each – each has no intrinsic value – in fact, each is not a part of all – because, for one thing, there is no all.
1 July 1993
The old
paradigm: all providing for all, because each existed in all, and all have to
provide for each, as an intrinsically valuable part of the whole. “From each according to his ability, to each according
to his need;” not according to his work or contribution.
The new paradigm: The contribution of each to all creates an obligation of the part of all to help each. Each contributes to all with the sole motive of creating that obligation. And all helps each only because of the contribution of each – each has no intrinsic value – in fact, each is not a part of all – because, for one thing, there is no all.
The new paradigm: The contribution of each to all creates an obligation of the part of all to help each. Each contributes to all with the sole motive of creating that obligation. And all helps each only because of the contribution of each – each has no intrinsic value – in fact, each is not a part of all – because, for one thing, there is no all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)